You got me dead tired with your constant obstructions, are not you(I mean all) going to say something positive? Anyone can post games and claim they were played against Stockfish. People make outlandish claims all the time. So why isn't it major news that a Bulgarian candidate master has beaten it? Because it hasn't been confirmed by independent evidence. If a grandmaster was able to beat it, that would be major news in the chess world. Everyone familiar with Stockfish knows it's stronger than any grandmaster. Maybe, there is a reason for that after all? However, the FIDE Elo rating of 2095 you have is not enough to beat StockFish.Įveryone would be able to create such games like mine with SF, but they don't.Īlso, everyone would be able to write a book like 'The Secret of Chess', but they don't. If you want someone to believe such an outlandish idea, please get proof! Anyone that's good enough at chess can post such a game as you have posted!įrom the links provided, I can see now that you are definitely not TOTALLY fake. However, there has bound to be at least one article if your claims are legit. People are unaware that teleportation has existed since 1996! However, there are plenty of articles on the fact that we have the technology to do that. So surely, if you have beat StockFish it would be on the news, as that is a much greater accomplishment then becoming a grandmaster!Īs you have said, all great accomplishments are well known. While many grandmasters are not in Wikipedia, almost every single one if them, if not every single one of them, would have some sort of article written on them. Have you checked my SF games, they are of exceptional quality, why would you refuse to believe in them? People like me, that just work hard, are not in the news, the biggest accomplishments in science and creativity are usually assessed much much later, decades or so later, as their authors have been far ahead of their time. Google's Alpha-SF match is in the news, the match with the fake 30/1 hardware, and people believe it. If you want to claim this, please become a grandmaster and win the World Chess Championship. The best chess player in the world has not beaten StockFish, so unless you can't beat him, stop claiming that you have beat StockFish. I may seem to be redundant, but I am trying to emphasize how CRAZY it is for you to claim that you have achieved such a tremendous feat! A human being cannot ever surpass engines like AlphaZero and StockFish, no matter how many positions they study! A human would not be able to beat StockFish if they could calculate 1 million positions per second! A human could not calculate 100 positions per second! You claim to be the best chess player in the world! You claim to be able to beat every single chess engine in the world! You claim to have beaten the very chess engine that has been unable to be beaten by anyone else except another chess engine that calculates TENS OF MILLIONS of positions in a second! And yet, no one has heard of it except in the forums you have created.
Surely, you would have done better since you claim to be the best player in the world! Surely this would have been in the news by now! I can't believe you have gotten ANYONE to believe such a lie! Lyudmil_Tsvetkov, can you please explain how you can even ATTEMPT to claim to have beaten StockFish, in which no one can even come close to such an accomplishment? You have a Tactics rating of 1000 and a Chess Mentor rating of 1400. If you don't have a reputation as a successful author or player, you can't expect many people to buy your book.Īnd he surely can't expect people to buy his book if he has a reputation as a pompous keyboard warrior. When My 60 Memorable Games was published, Fischer didn't have a reputation as a chess book author but people knew he was one of the world's best players.
If one doesn't have a reputation through his writing, he needs to have established his credibility through his playing. He had credibility because he wrote some excellent chess books that were among the biggest selling of all time.
Irving Chernev wasn't a grandmaster but he was one of the most successful authors of chess books (if not the most successful). One doesn't need to be a grandmaster in order have credibility as a chess book author. And I certainly wouldn't buy a diamond if I didn't know what it was worth. If I found a diamond in a waste bin, of course I would question its value. If you would not, then you are simply very naive at the least. Or, a lingot of gold, would you accept a lingot of gold, fetched by someone who is not a goldsmith? When you find a diamond in a waste bin, do you question its credentials? That is a lot of time for me, currently.īragadoccio or not bragadoccio, the book is worth what it is worth. To get the GM title, you should play in at least 10 tournaments in the course of one or 2 years.
0 kommentar(er)
